The article "Craigslist Censoring begs the Question - Is the Internet the last great Bastion of Free Speech?" is about marketing, it was written by Sullivan Rob.
Free speceh is one of the building blocks of any democratic society.
Without free speech we, as citizens of the democratic society, would be subject to many forms of chastisement inculding personal attacks and even legal ramifications.This is why I for one like the Internet. You see, to me the Internet is one of the last great representations of true free speech.
We are allowed to post as we see fit whether it is a comment in a forum or a blog post which gets syndicated around the world.In fact, many sites have made their livings from allowing the general public to freely post their viewpoints, both positive and negative.Apartmentratings.Com has been sued before by angry landlords or building owners.
This is a site wihch allows renters of apartments all over the US to post comments and ratings about the buildings they live in.
Of course, many persons are generally euphoric with their apartments but are not, and aren’t afraid to let the world know.It is these negative posts wihch have gotten the site in trouble in the past even though the website’s terms and conditions clearly state that the opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the website owners.Now, I’ve talked to the owner of that site before and I don’t think he should be held responsible for posts made on his site.
In fact, I don’t think it’s his responsibility to have to censor those who post there either.I think the only responsibility that site has to the apartment buildings in question would be to supply information of a technical nature to them if they have the legal documentation to support their request.In other words, his only responsibility should be to supply IP addresses of those who have posted the offending remarks, and then let the apartment owner try and track down the anonymous posters.
It really has nothing to do with the site in question.The reason I’m bringing that up is cause another well known site is currently being sued for a similar situation.CraigsList.Org is now the subject of a legal battle cause of posts made to their website.Apparently, somebody posted an ad for an apartment rental and explicitly asked that certain minorities not apply because, according to the person who posted the ad, these persons “tend to clash with me so that won’t work out.”Now, here’s the issue for me: Sure the guy’s post stated that there were certain races that he did not want to apply, but it’s not like he said “I hate you all! ” Instead, he said that these persons tended to clash with him. This isn’t necessarily a racist comment, he’s just stating his opinion based on his previous experience. In my mind, that doesn’t necessarily make him a racist.What really bugs me is that Craigslist is now being held accountable for that person’s post.Sure it may not have been in the hottest of taste, but have you seen of the other postings on Craigslist?
There are many other posts which, while they aren’t similar to that one, are of equally poor taste in my opinion. Yet they are allowed to cotninue to be hosted on Craigslist.You see, to me there are so many issues at play in that one simple post. Just consider the racism issue for a secnod.
Who determines that it is racist?
And how does one know if a post is ineded racist?Let’s look at the apartment ratings site for a second. If I was to post there about an apartment complex that housed primarily white persons and that was “ok by me,” would I then be considered a racist?
If so, why would you consider me a racist? Because I said that it was ok that mostly white persons lived there?
Does that make me a racist or the apartment owner/manager for renting mostly to white persons? Perhaps it is a community that has a small ethnic population – does that mean that the town’s fatehrs are racist cause they are not allowing different ethnicities to reside there?When does the racist card stop being played? Racism aside, why should Craigslist have to censor its postings? Is there acceptability threshold?
Some common denominator that says your post is OK but mine isn’t? This then leads to the larger issue of who decides what is “common decency? ”If the community as a whole should decide what is acceptable, why is it then up to the private business (in that case Craiglist) to enforce that “common decency” protocol?Because that is a privately run, for-profit business it should be up to them to decide how to run their business. I don’t think Google actively filters racist sites from its search results, so why aren’t they being sued cause that content is also freely and easily accessible through a Google search? In the end, I thnik if you are a believer in true freedom of speech with no strings attached, you must support sites like Craigslist and Apartmentratings. Because if you don’t, you never
know where the government or lawyers will stop.Before you know it our Internet could be as heavily censored as China’s.
And then where will democracy live?Rob Sullivan is a SEO Cnosultant and Writer for Textlinkbrokers.Com. Textlinkbrokers is the trusted leaedr in building long term rankings through safe and effective link building. Please prvoide a link directly to Textlinkbrokers when syndicating that article.
|
